<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wide Angle Lenses Are For Portraits Too &#8211; Tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/</link>
	<description>Photography tips and techniques for the cash-challenged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deborahwolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>deborahwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Hi Jessie. Thanks for dropping by. To answer your question about which wide angle lens to get for a Nikon D60 - a DX camera, I&#039;ll reference my earlier comment to Emily:

&quot;My research indicates the Canon 40D is a DX camera, which will effect how ‘wide’ your lenses will functionally be. There is approximately a 1.5 magnifying effect, making a 35mm seem more like a 50mm, for example. I would suggest perhaps a 24mm or 28mm as a starting point. I’d probably lean more towards the 24mm. That’s my $0.02 worth.&quot;

Still my two cents worth. Have fun and happy holidays!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jessie. Thanks for dropping by. To answer your question about which wide angle lens to get for a Nikon D60 &#8211; a DX camera, I&#8217;ll reference my earlier comment to Emily:</p>
<p>&#8220;My research indicates the Canon 40D is a DX camera, which will effect how ‘wide’ your lenses will functionally be. There is approximately a 1.5 magnifying effect, making a 35mm seem more like a 50mm, for example. I would suggest perhaps a 24mm or 28mm as a starting point. I’d probably lean more towards the 24mm. That’s my $0.02 worth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still my two cents worth. Have fun and happy holidays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessie De Laby</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>jessie De Laby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-88</guid>
		<description>hi!
so i&#039;ve been looking at wide angle lenses
and i would like to know the best length for one.
i have a nikon d60
and i really love how it looks with portraits:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi!<br />
so i&#8217;ve been looking at wide angle lenses<br />
and i would like to know the best length for one.<br />
i have a nikon d60<br />
and i really love how it looks with portraits:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deborahwolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>deborahwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Hey Matthew, so glad you&#039;re enjoying the tutorials and thanks so much for sharing some of your images with me! I love it when people share. I ventured on over to your website and you have some really stand out images. Thanks so much for commenting and happy shooting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matthew, so glad you&#8217;re enjoying the tutorials and thanks so much for sharing some of your images with me! I love it when people share. I ventured on over to your website and you have some really stand out images. Thanks so much for commenting and happy shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Siegelbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Siegelbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Deborah,
Ilove your tutorials and and enjoy reading them to &quot;brush up&quot; on techniques.
I too love to use my Sigma 10mm-20mm wide angle on my Canon 40D
I gett great shots &quot;full of life and energy!&quot;
Here are some examples
http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Family/Family-Reunion-2009/IMG0158-6/615107593_ZFbc8-S-2.jpg
http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Family/Family-Reunion-2009/IMG0141-7/615097978_weYWA-S-1.jpg
http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Events/wedding/IMG0228-13/679180571_Xupe4-S.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deborah,<br />
Ilove your tutorials and and enjoy reading them to &#8220;brush up&#8221; on techniques.<br />
I too love to use my Sigma 10mm-20mm wide angle on my Canon 40D<br />
I gett great shots &#8220;full of life and energy!&#8221;<br />
Here are some examples<br />
<a href="http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Family/Family-Reunion-2009/IMG0158-6/615107593_ZFbc8-S-2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Family/Family-Reunion-2009/IMG0158-6/615107593_ZFbc8-S-2.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Family/Family-Reunion-2009/IMG0141-7/615097978_weYWA-S-1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Family/Family-Reunion-2009/IMG0141-7/615097978_weYWA-S-1.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Events/wedding/IMG0228-13/679180571_Xupe4-S.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://strongtreeimages.smugmug.com/Events/wedding/IMG0228-13/679180571_Xupe4-S.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deborahwolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>deborahwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-74</guid>
		<description>You are very welcome Chris. I look forward to future comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very welcome Chris. I look forward to future comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris..</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Hi Again.
Well thanks for explaining that I now have a clear understanding of what you mean.
I have been into photography since &quot;way back in the day&quot;, to. but had never been explained that before.
I started with a 126 camera then progressed to film using a russian built Zenith ET, yeppers it was built like a tank and as heavy as one but it got me into photography. I moved onto a Fuji Bridge camera, before buying the EOS 40D...

I will be back thanks again
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Again.<br />
Well thanks for explaining that I now have a clear understanding of what you mean.<br />
I have been into photography since &#8220;way back in the day&#8221;, to. but had never been explained that before.<br />
I started with a 126 camera then progressed to film using a russian built Zenith ET, yeppers it was built like a tank and as heavy as one but it got me into photography. I moved onto a Fuji Bridge camera, before buying the EOS 40D&#8230;</p>
<p>I will be back thanks again<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deborahwolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>deborahwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris. When digital cameras were first introduced, they were all DX cameras, meaning they did not have a &#039;full frame&#039; sensor. 

The best analogy I can come up with is the difference between old film point and shoot cameras and 35mm SLRs. The point and shoots usually used 110mm film, whereas the 35mm SLR cameras obviously used, well....35mm film. The smaller negative produced by the 110mm cameras meant you couldn&#039;t enlarge the final print very much. In fact, the typical 4x6 inch &#039;snap shot&#039; was pretty much at the outside limits of that film. If you&#039;ve ever seen an 8x10 inch enlargement from that film, you would have noticed the significant &#039;grain&#039; and ensuing softness of the image.

A DX sensor is 1.5 times smaller than a 35mm negative. In other words, those of us who started shooting back in the day, couldn&#039;t help but notice, when we switched to our first DSLR, that we couldn&#039;t seem to get as much image within the frame as we were used to. That&#039;s because we were, in essence, shooting with smaller &#039;film&#039;.

Now, of course, Canon and Nikon both have full frame cameras, meaning the sensor is now the same size as a 35mm film negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris. When digital cameras were first introduced, they were all DX cameras, meaning they did not have a &#8216;full frame&#8217; sensor. </p>
<p>The best analogy I can come up with is the difference between old film point and shoot cameras and 35mm SLRs. The point and shoots usually used 110mm film, whereas the 35mm SLR cameras obviously used, well&#8230;.35mm film. The smaller negative produced by the 110mm cameras meant you couldn&#8217;t enlarge the final print very much. In fact, the typical 4&#215;6 inch &#8217;snap shot&#8217; was pretty much at the outside limits of that film. If you&#8217;ve ever seen an 8&#215;10 inch enlargement from that film, you would have noticed the significant &#8216;grain&#8217; and ensuing softness of the image.</p>
<p>A DX sensor is 1.5 times smaller than a 35mm negative. In other words, those of us who started shooting back in the day, couldn&#8217;t help but notice, when we switched to our first DSLR, that we couldn&#8217;t seem to get as much image within the frame as we were used to. That&#8217;s because we were, in essence, shooting with smaller &#8216;film&#8217;.</p>
<p>Now, of course, Canon and Nikon both have full frame cameras, meaning the sensor is now the same size as a 35mm film negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris..</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Hi
Excellent advice on site...
I use a Canon EOS 40D to, my question is what is:
What do you mean a DX Camera?
Regards
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Excellent advice on site&#8230;<br />
I use a Canon EOS 40D to, my question is what is:<br />
What do you mean a DX Camera?<br />
Regards<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily moore</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>emily moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Any suggestions help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Any suggestions help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deborahwolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.studioonashoestring.com/410/wide-angle-lenses-are-for-portraits-too-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>deborahwolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studioonashoestring.com/?p=410#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hi Emily.  Thanks so much from dropping by.  My research indicates the Canon 40D is a DX camera, which will effect how &#039;wide&#039; your lenses will functionally be.  There is approximately a 1.5 magnifying effect, making a 35mm seem more like a 50mm, for example.  I would suggest perhaps a 24mm or 28mm as a starting point.  I&#039;d probably lean more towards the 24mm.  That&#039;s my $0.02 worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Emily.  Thanks so much from dropping by.  My research indicates the Canon 40D is a DX camera, which will effect how &#8216;wide&#8217; your lenses will functionally be.  There is approximately a 1.5 magnifying effect, making a 35mm seem more like a 50mm, for example.  I would suggest perhaps a 24mm or 28mm as a starting point.  I&#8217;d probably lean more towards the 24mm.  That&#8217;s my $0.02 worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
